meow

1 files changed, 89 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/ling/semantics.md b/ling/semantics.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..747d9c3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ling/semantics.md
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+---
+layout: linguistics
+title: linguistics/semantics
+---
+
+# notes on semantics
+
+Semantics is the study of **meaning**.
+
+How do we know what sentences are true and which are false?<br>
+What does it *mean* for a sentence to be true?<br>
+What conditions must hold for a sentence to be true?
+
+Formal semantics attempts to answer those questions by providing a *framework* for determining what *conditions* must hold for a sentence to be true.
+
+This framework is [first-order/predicate logic](../math/logic) and the [simply-typed lambda calculus](../plt/lambda-calculus). On top of this, we often build set theory, relying on *characteristic functions* of the lambda calculus as denotations of *set membership*.
+
+
+## Basic Principles
+
+### Compositionality
+
+The *Principle of Compositionality* states that the meaning of a *constituent* is determined entirely by its *components*. This is *the* fundamental underlying principle behind formal logic and subsequently semantics. It holds for not just sentence composition (syntax), but also *word formation* (morphology), and what's of interest to us here - meaning (semantics).
+
+### Substitution
+
+The *Principle of Substitution* states that substituting one part of an expression with something else of the same meaning *preserves* the meaning of the expression as a whole. This might be thought of as a given, but semantics has its roots in philosophy, and philosophers care very much about enumerating their givens.
+
+### Predicate Logic & The Lambda Calculus
+
+Formal semantics begets a formal system for such semantics, and *first-order logic* and *the lambda calculus* are a natural fit. Semantics is the study of meaning - and what is logic but a system for expressing meaning? As discussed above, language functions by composition - and what are functions but their property of composition?
+
+[*An Invitation to Formal Semantics*](https://eecoppock.info/bootcamp/semantics-boot-camp.pdf) covers basic logic and the lambda calculus well in its first six chapters. Otherwise, for a worse introduction, see [logic](../math/logic), and [the lambda calculus](../plt/lambda-calculus).
+
+## Denotational Semantics
+
+With basic logic and the lambda calculus under our belt, we may simply get straight to assigning *meaning* to language. We consider two *basic types* to start: the type of entities, $e$, and the type of truth values, $t$. Our function types we denote by ordered pairs: that is, a function from $e$ to $t$ is of type $⟨e,t⟩$. This is perhaps clunkier notation than the type-theoretic $e→t$, but it is what it is. (And does avoid issues of precedence.)
+
+### Entities and Functions
+
+> *I am Alice.* <br>
+> *Alice is bad.* <br>
+> *The blue pigeon flew away.*
+
+- Noun: $⟨e,t⟩ ↝ λx.Noun(x)$
+- Verb (intransitive): $⟨e,t⟩ ↝ λx.Verb(x)$
+- Verb (transitive): $⟨e,⟨e,t⟩⟩ ↝ λy.λx.Verb(x, y)$
+- Verb (meaningless): $⟨⟨e,t⟩,⟨e,t⟩⟩ ↝ λP.λx.P(x)$
+- Adj: $⟨⟨e,t⟩,⟨e,t⟩⟩ ↝ λNoun.λx.[Adj(x) ∧ Noun(x)]$
+
+- or (clausal): $⟨t,⟨t,t⟩⟩ ↝ λq.λp.[p ∨ q]$
+- and (clausal): $⟨t,⟨t,t⟩⟩ ↝ λq.λp.[p ∧ q]$
+- or (verbal): $⟨⟨e,t⟩,⟨⟨e,t⟩,⟨e,t⟩⟩⟩ ↝ λQ.λP.λx.[P(x) ∨ Q(x)]$
+- and (verbal): $⟨⟨e,t⟩,⟨⟨e,t⟩,⟨e,t⟩⟩⟩ ↝ λQ.λP.λx.[P(x) ∧ Q(x)]$
+- or (quantifiers): $⟨⟨e,⟨e,t⟩⟩,⟨⟨e,⟨e,t⟩⟩,⟨e,⟨e,t⟩⟩⟩⟩ ↝ λQ.λP.λy.λx.[P(x,y) ∨ Q(x,y)]$
+- and (quantifiers): $⟨⟨e,⟨e,t⟩⟩,⟨⟨e,⟨e,t⟩⟩,⟨e,⟨e,t⟩⟩⟩⟩ ↝ λQ.λP.λy.λx.[P(x,y) ∧ Q(x,y)]$
+
+- not: $⟨⟨e,t⟩,⟨e,t⟩⟩ ↝ λP.λx.¬P(x)$
+
+### Quantification
+
+- every: $⟨⟨e,t⟩,⟨⟨e,t⟩,t⟩⟩ ↝ λQ.λP.∀x.[P(x) → Q(x)]$
+  - everything: $⟨⟨e,t⟩,t⟩ ↝ λP.∀x.P(x)$
+- some: $⟨⟨e,t⟩,⟨⟨e,t⟩,t⟩⟩ ↝ λQ.λP.∃x.[P(x) ∧ Q(x)]$
+  - something: $⟨⟨e,t⟩,t⟩ ↝ λP.∃x.P(x)$
+- no: $⟨⟨e,t⟩,⟨⟨e,t⟩,t⟩⟩ ↝ λQ.λP.∀x.[P(x) → ¬Q(x)] (or λQ.λP.¬∃x.[P(x) ∧ Q(x)])$
+  - nothing: $⟨⟨e,t⟩,t⟩ ↝ λP.¬∃x.P(x)$ (or $λP.∀x.¬P(x)$)
+
+### Reference
+
+### Numbers and Plurality
+
+### Event Semantics
+
+### Tense and Aspect
+
+## Beyond Truth
+
+### Necessity and Possibility
+
+### Command, Request, Obligation
+
+> *Alice, run!* <br>
+> *Alice, please run.* <br>
+> *Alice should run.*
+
+### Questions
+## Resources
+- ✨ [Invitation to Formal Semantics](https://eecoppock.info/bootcamp/semantics-boot-camp.pdf)