summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/mathematics
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJJ2024-01-18 06:59:29 +0000
committerJJ2024-01-18 06:59:29 +0000
commitd32e7e460e5b68a428126d45e23267bf2c30f57c (patch)
treee7bce786bd44d71e28749b0abf5636e4a4b39c65 /mathematics
parent3c334febd6f680449c9fccb4d421b6c0a0704084 (diff)
meow
Diffstat (limited to 'mathematics')
-rw-r--r--mathematics/logic.md82
1 files changed, 47 insertions, 35 deletions
diff --git a/mathematics/logic.md b/mathematics/logic.md
index dca0cac..e19cb52 100644
--- a/mathematics/logic.md
+++ b/mathematics/logic.md
@@ -20,48 +20,60 @@ and many others.
### [propositional logic](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/propositional+logic)
-**propositional logic** or *0th-order logic* deals with raw *propositions*.
+**propositional logic** or **zeroth-order logic** deals with raw *propositions*.
**propositions** are statements that *reduce* to a **truth value**.
-truth values are classically either true or false. i'm not quite sure if there are alternative approaches that change this.
+truth values are classically either true or false. in non-classical logics, this can differ.
the basic foundations of propositional logic are as follows:
- |
-------|--------------
-p | a proposition
-¬p | not p
-p → q | p implies q
-⊤ | true
-⊥ | false
-⊢ | derives/yields
-
-several logical concepts are *derivable* from the above:
-
- |
-------|--------------------|----
-p ∨ q | ¬p → q | or
-p ∧ q | ¬(p → ¬q) | and
-p ⟺ q | (p → q) ∧ (q → p) | iff
-p ⊕ q | (p ∨ q) ∧ ¬(p ∧ q) | xor
-
-to do anything interesting, several rules must exist:
-
-replacement rules |
-------------------------------------|----------------
-((p ∨ q) ∨ r) → (p ∨ (q ∨ r)) | associative
-(p ∧ q) → (q ∧ p) | commutative
-((p ∧ q) → r) → (p → (q → r)) | exportation
-(p → q) → (¬q → ¬p) | transposition
-(p → q) → (¬p ∨ q) | implication
-((p ∨ q) ∨ r) → ((p ∧ r) ∨ (q ∧ r)) | distributive
-((p) ∧ (q)) → (p ∧ q) | conjunction
-p ⟺ (¬¬p) | double negation
-
-double negation is not allowed in intuistionistic logic systems.
+notation | definition
+---------|--------------
+p | a *proposition*
+¬p | *not* p
+p → q | *if* p *then* q, p *implies* q
+0 | *false*
+1 | *true*
+
+several logical connectives are *derivable* from the above:
+
+notation | derivation | definition
+------|---------------------|----
+p ∨ q | ¬p → q | p *or* q, *disjunction*
+p ∧ q | ¬(p → ¬q) | p *and* q, *conjunction*
+p → q | ¬p ∨ q | p *implies* q, (material) *implication* (again)
+p ↔ q | (p → q) ∧ (q → p) | p *if and only if* q, p *iff* q
+p ⊕ q | (p ∨ q) ∧ ¬(p ∧ q) | p *exclusively or* q, p *xor* q
+p ↑ q | ¬(p ∧ q) | p *not both* q, p *nand* q
+p ↓ q | ¬(p ∨ q) | *neither* p *nor* q, p *nor* q
+
+note that several of these definitions are circular.
+our choice in $¬$ and $→$ as the primitive connectives is thus arbitrary.
+interestingly, ↑ and ↓ are *functionally complete*: we may define all other connectives in terms of them.
+
+<details>
+<summary>aside: nand and nor</summary>
+
+notation | definition
+---------|-----------
+¬p | p ↑ p
+p → q | p ↑ ¬q
+p ∨ q | ¬p ↑ ¬q
+p ∧ q | (p ↑ q) ↑ (p ↑ q)
+p ↔ q | (p ↑ q) ↑ (p ∨ q)
+
+notation | definition
+---------|-----------
+¬p | p ↓ p
+p → q | (¬p ↓ q) ↓ (¬p ↓ q)
+p ∨ q | (p ↓ q) ↓ (p ↓ q)
+p ∧ q | ¬p ↓ ¬q
+p ↔ q | ...
+
+</details>
### [predicate logic](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/predicate+logic)
-**predicate logic** or *first-order logic* adds variables and quantifiers to propositions:
+**predicate logic** or **first-order logic** adds variables and quantifiers to propositions:
* ∀x: for all x
* ∃y: there exists a y